Detailed Preamble including
an example of firm commitments by the provincial Ministers of the Environment is
towards the end so as not to deflect away from the seriousness/urgency of this
email; you can click here to go there instantaneously.
Clicking on the underlined words in all of our emails will always launch the
relevant web pages for more info. Sorry for any typos/grammar. This is written
informally and also see some relevance to recent massive
public complaints re the JEWELS of
Spanning almost the entire night
again, I `perused/analyzed’ some of the lake data on the
HRM’s website and I am literally SHOCKED with several of the TP (total
phosphorus) values reported there for this year, 2010, and to some extent
for year-2009, as well. They are abnormally high compared to data of even recent
years as well as in comparison with data of the last 2
decades!
====== Our `modeled natural
background values’, i.e., prior to any human disturbance in the entire
watersheds (and calibrated with some paleolimnological and other biological
models) have been in the range of 2-5-6 μg/l TP for
Important note:-- I am just
wondering if there were typos in the HRM’s Excel spreadsheets. If there are no
typos, not to worry!
And the Cha values (considered as a `surrogate’
for biological productivity, in general terminology) do not correspond at all as
most of them are quite low, actually lower than the recent decadal values for
several lakes that I perused on the HRM website.
I have not yet compared those with
the data that I possess based on `paleoecological
inferences’ from diverse sources since my primary focus these days is on our
advanced Stage III and
IV Protocols which have hardly been carried out by anyone in this neck of
the woods as I stated to the Harbour East Community
Council (HECC) at their monthly meeting in August, 2010. Don’t read their
abridged minutes since the HRM’s clerical staff made massive errors on what I
stated.
Probable reasons for the low
Cha data:-- The time of sampling
and the weather can play a significant part as I stated at the public meeting at
the MicMac Boat Club last month held by Councillors McCluskey
and Fisher.
…………………….. In addition, every leading scientific handbook on lake sampling also
caution on same (I don’t re‑invent any
wheels)…………………………..
The other reason could be a
`probable increase’ in the plants and weeds in the lakes which would compete
with phytoplankton (Cha as the
general indicator) for the nutrients, not just TP
alone.
The huge anguish of September,
2010 by many long time residents at the Jewels of Dartmouth, BANOOK
and MICMAC,
showed there has been a remarkable increase in the nuisance weeds; I have
received similar complaints from the general public dating back over the last 5
years and I believe I sent a `global email’ to most of the HRM councillors/staff
which was Cc’d to several at the Province, as is my modus operandi
always!
Relevant note:-- Re the aforesaid
two lakes, the complaints are coincidental with the development at
Dartmouth
Crossing. I am aware about the fish pond
Dartmouth Crossing allegedly has at an outlet or two and that fish were thriving
there superbly.
But anyone who understands formal
limnology will tell you that high nutrients do not necessarily impede fish
population; if anything, they may increase
significantly!
As almost everyone Cc’d/Bcc’d here
knows, I hail from INDIA
(immigrated here in 1966) and in India, the TP values are extremely high, many
cases greater than a whopping one hundred (100) µg/l. But per published
scientific reports, there is abundant fish and plant life in them and only in
extreme cases of excessive hypolimnetic DO-depletion, that fish life was
negatively impacted.
For another local example, at the
lake that I have lived continuously since February 1972, MAYNARD
LAKE in
I have NOT observed any significant
changes at
NOTE:-- In addition, some benthic
macroinvertebrate surveys we conducted during sporadic years at Maynard Lake
showed NO SIGNIFICANT ISSUES either in `species richness’ or in `species
diversity’; if there was, as Councillor
Gloria McCluskey knows more than anyone else, I would have immediately made
one or more detailed submissions to the HECC
(hahaha)!
We have not yet conducted our chironomid
mentum deformity studies at
[Detailed
Preamble: Cameron, this is written informally commencing at around 6:15 AM,
and is Cc’d to those I feel relevant at HRM, Halifax Water, and at the NSE (Nova
Scotia Environment Dept.). I also Cc the `environmental reps’ of all the 3
provincial political parties since it is their paid jobs to pay pragmatic
attention to environmental concerns. I know for a fact that the NSE is doing
absolutely nothing pragmatic, and I will no longer supply them our data or
scientific synopses since I already did that on numerous occasions during the
entire 1980’s and 90’s and they never got back to me, although there were firm
commitments to the contrary. As one sad/sorry example, see the firm commitment
by the Hon. ROBBIE HARRISON which was never kept to this day, alas (unless
they pay the professional value for it and not just `symbolic honoraria’ the way
HRM did on occasions)!
………………………… I don’t think you are
aware of it Cameron though that the data archives your predecessor, Dr. Tony Blouin, got
from me in 2005 or so under a conditional signed agreement (we had a subsidiary
voice‑recorded agreement as well) only cover around 20% of the archives in my
possession, btw, as I had informed Tony on numerous occasions when he was still
with the HRM ……………………………………….].
[Top]
(Clicking on the underlined words
will launch the relevant web pages)
Shalom Murti
Mandaville Post-Grad Dip.,
“Yes, We Can!”, a 4:30 minute
music video on YouTube
Chair & Scientific
Director
Soil & Water Conservation
Society of Metro Halifax- SWCSMH, a
multi-discipline scientific/technical stakeholder
group
…………… and Public Art in Halifax Regional Municipality,
NS
Email transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be secure or
error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not
accept any liability for errors or omissions in the contents of this message
that arise as a result of email transmissions. If verification is required
please request a hard copy version.