... |
Herald file A fish lies dead along the
banks of the Little Sackville River.
|
Fish disaster draws criticism
about response
By Bill Power /
Staff Reporter
A hard lesson learned.
That's how Walter Regan, president of the Sackville Rivers
Association sums up the pollution crisis in the Little
Sackville River.
"So much damage could have been averted if the proper
authorities responded faster," Mr. Regan said Friday.
A sudden influx of aluminum hydroxide overnight June 11
killed more than 4,000 fish - many of them salmon - wiping out
the much of the results of the association's conservation
efforts over 14 years.
"If anything good comes out of this, hopefully, it will be
the establishment of protocols so what happened to the Little
Sackville River won't happen again," Mr. Regan said.
Investigators with a regional environmental emergency team,
which has representatives from all three levels of government,
provided details Friday of the results of cleanup and
containment efforts.
The timing of the response was also defended.
"These investigations take time. The response must be
appropriate and collaborative," said Glen Warren, an inspector
with the provincial Environment Department.
But Sackville MLA John Holm insisted delays were costly.
"Much of the damage could have been averted with a prompter
response . . . but I don't think the authorities understood
the seriousness of the situation," Mr, Holm said.
Area resident Dawn Smith said many of her neighbours along
the Little Sackville River were upset about the slow response
to reports of the problem and about the lack of information
afterward about any potential threat to human safety.
"The authorities should have advised us quickly on the
nature of the pollution. Most of us have kids that play along
the river," Ms. Smith said.
The environmental damage is obviously a huge setback for
the Sackville Rivers Association.
Mr. Regan said the association has struggled for years to
raise public awareness of the value of the river to the
community.
"When we started here, people were dumping construction
materials and shopping carts and you name it into this
waterway," he said.
He said members' biggest concern now is that the damage
will stifle efforts to get the general public to view the
Little Sackville as a real river.
"We've been working so hard to get people to recognize this
as a valuable natural asset. Now, here it is, polluted and
dead.
"The big challenge now will be to keep people thinking
about it as a river."
|